Thursday, June 23, 2011

Copters and Tractors and Jets, Oh My!


Dog days of June here. We've just passed the summer solstice, so the long march back toward winter has begun. The weather tends to bounce between upper 60's and lower 80's, usually with some clouds in the sky, sometimes clear blue and sometimes, like today, totally overcast. A couple of mosquitoes humming around. Ordinary Rhode Island summer.

Except that this weekend will be the big air show at Naval Air Station Quonset, about two miles as the crow flies from our home. Several planes have been in the air practicing all week, mostly World War II-vintage props. On the other hand, the big cargo planes aren't coming and going as usual this week, so it's actually been a bit quieter than usual.

Until today, when the Blue Angels took to the air. They're the last act for the Air Show, the rockstars of the whole getup. I've seen them in person, and being no expert on flight, and fearing heights in general, I'm highly impressed by the precision, speed and of course, noise. (The air show folks hand out free earplugs to the crowd--a welcome courtesy.)

So the Blue Angels and a few other jets are now in town rehearsing, and it's possible to hear them screaming and roaring all over the place. It will go mostly quiet for a few minutes, perhaps with a distant purr in the air, when suddenly the scream gets loud again and you can hear a plane (or several) ripping by. If they're especially low--within a few hundred feet--a low hum accompanies the scream. Even as an adult, for me the experience ranges between annoying and unsettling.

For a 21-month-old girl, however, it can be pretty much terrifying. Eva normally loves to watch planes, scans the sky for them, and will point one out as soon as she sees or hears it (and frequently when she doesn't). When the big cargo lugs are coming in and out of the air station, lumbering potbellied 4-prop behemoths, Eva will stop whatever she's doing and stare.

However, when these high-speed war machines go exploding by, the poor girl is no less than nervous, frequently frightened enough to seek a hug, and sometimes dissolves altogether into tears. It doesn't help that right now, as the boys are practicing out there, it's supposed to be naptime.

The planes started flying just as I cleaned up Eva's lunch and brought her into her room for a few books before her nap. I began reading to her when the first group of jets came low overhead.

Now Eva is also learning to listen and talk, and she's growing increasingly sophisticated at it. Just a week or so ago she told her first story, a series of single words which referred to a sequence of events in time: "Mama...dada...pizza...milk...sauce." ("Sauce" being applesauce.) In her babyish way, Eva had described dinner to her doll. Just recently she's begun pairing words, as if she's linking the concepts: "Mama-dada...Mama-Eva...Eva-dada."

Of course she still talks a fair amount of gibberish, that almost-significant alphabet soup of sound toddlers make when they're engaging you but have no English at their command. What's particularly entertaining is when Eva sprinkles actual words in amongst the gibberish. And today, with the planes disturbing our reading session, was the best example yet.

Eva looked up nervously when the planes roared overhead, and clearly wasn't paying attention to Winnie the Pooh, so I started explaining. "Those are planes," I told her, "They're making a lot of noise because they're close to the ground." Of course Eva was just as unsettled as before, so I kept on repeating this, adding that "You're safe. You're here with Dada."

Soon, Eva was repeating, sort of, my words back to me, with her endearingly wide eyes, signed gestures and emphatic diction:

"Eema thama muissu abba pwaaaane."
"Oowa vimmi dikka guwa nooise."
"Matha aiea bamma anni gwoound."
"Amma thama iwi magga safe."

She kept on like that for a little while, nonsense followed by one of the words I'd emphasized to her. I got the feeling it was therapeutic for her, since the planes kept flying by and she was plainly still nervous. At one point, since they were so close, I grabbed her, ran outside and we saw four Blue Angels go ripping overhead in close formation, just a couple of hundred feet above the trees. "Planes," I said, pointing.

"Pwaaanes," Eva answered.

After returning her to her room, the jets came ripping by once more even lower, and I cursed myself for bringing the little girl in too soon. And of course she exploded into tears at the sound, so I went in, calmed her down with another book, and went back out to finish my lunch.

As of right now, the jets are still in the air practicing, and still occasionally flying overhead. And I just checked on the little girl: passed out on her bed, partially covered by her blankie, with one corner stuffed in her mouth.

That's my girl.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

My Crappy Garden


I'm a pretty foofy guy. I do have my angry moments, and there are certainly dark aspects to my personality, but by and large I prefer happiness, love and bright colors. So much so that my sister Julie, after seeing the family nameplate I painted for our front door, opined that I'd father only girls.


(Sorry, Jules. Little Fausto's on the way after all. And remember that Dad was a stud athlete but fathered two girls before he & Mom managed to come up with me.)

In high school I took the whole bright color thing to kind of a silly extreme. Miami Vice was big during my high school years, and despite living in small-town New Hampshire and having pretty much no sense of style at all, I did my middle-class best to emulate Sonny Crockett's look. Only in my case, instead of custom-made Italian silk suits, custom loafers and black Ferrari, it meant light blue cotton pants, pastel shirts, boat moccasins and a gray El Camino. It was roughly as convincing as my espresso-and-stache impression of Tony Stark. Less so probably because of the pink shirt and my inability to grow any facial hair. On top of the timid personality and confirmed reputation as a dork.

Anyway, that silly part of my personality is alive and well. It's the part that loves cartoons, the part that revels in reading to Eva in silly voices (the Winnie-the-Pooh characters are a work in progress), and a number of other foibles Kate could tell you about.

I've enjoyed a moderate bit of gardening for a while now, and since graduating college I've always loved having some flowers around. Inside or out (though you have to be careful about the kinds of flowers that attract bugs), blooms and leaves are good things. I read somewhere that keeping oxygen-producing plants in your living space can noticeably improve your state of mind--removing carbon dioxide and replacing it with oxygen in the local environment is a good thing--so I've made a point since then of keeping at least a few green and growing things nearby.

I had a few flower pots while at the condo, but obviously no garden. Now that Kate and I rent half of a duplex, I've made a very small effort to grow some flowers near the door. I'm not going to invest time (or money we barely have) in any landscaping, but I did pull a few weeds near the doorway and prepped a little triangular space--handily marked off with some plastic edging--for perennial seeds.

We now have a half-barrel sitting in the driveway, and then this little trianglular patch near the door. I spent the month of April mixing coffee grounds, which are very good for flowers, into the dirt. The potting soil in the half-barrel remained light and dark, but the dirt by the door, no matter how many times I dug it up and aerated it, has packed back down to roughly the texture of concrete.

In early May I planted seeds in the barrel and in the ground by the door. Among the other flowers by the door were about a dozen morning glory vines, which I was hoping would twine up around the hand railings and provide a nice colorful accent to the main entry. I even planted six morning glory seeds at the front corner of the house, so the vines might creep up the gutter pipe.

No such luck.

The barrel's looking quite nice, but the other two areas, not so much.
Even my my not-so-green-a-thumb standards, these flowers are pathetic. Just sad. I can't wait to move to Maine, where the soil is too acid, and the shade too heavy, for anything but ferns and moss. Screw the damn flowers.

(Of course, that didn't stop me from buying some fertilizer and tossing it on the ground. I'll be getting another bag of seeds and scattering those where nothing's growing now. I guess I'm chronic.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Thrift Store Fever


Recession or no recession, money or no money, for pretty much all of my adult life I've been into thrift stores. I suppose if I'd had all the money I wanted when growing up I never would've had a reason to go to one in the first place, but I've been a regular secondhand shopper for nearly half of my time on the planet. I think it started when my sister Julie got married, and her then-fiance' Halsey told me about a store in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where I could buy a good used tuxedo--Keezer's. I went, and was blown away. Powder-blue, light gray, white, maroon, long tails, you name it. Of course I got a basic sash collar poly-cotton blend, but I could see that thrift-store shopping is a great way to go.

When I studied in Italy during college, I also got to know several secondhand stores in Rome, and came away with a hideously ugly, green leather trenchcoat, with massive shoulders and a flip-up collar which made me look like a Nazi jackboot. But it was college, and my sense of style was about as fine as my choice of ways to spend my time. (That would be primarily in the basement of a fraternity.) So aside from the green leather trenchcoat (and later a gold lame' tuxedo which I added to my collection), around college I discovered the usefulness of thrift store shopping.

This year, as Kate and I have struggled through the winter on severely reduced means while I look for work, used clothing and other items have become an economic necessity. Thrift stores are almost an exchange mart for baby and toddler clothing, since as a rule the child outgrows the clothing before it wears out. To date we've bought perhaps three pairs of shoes for Eva at retail, but instead dropped $3 to $5 a pair for the used variety. Ditto for jackets and winter clothing.

Kate and I have bought furniture, such as Kate's desk and our couch, from a big used-goods store nearby called Savers. Every few weeks, if we're not out of money, I'll drop by to see if something we're looking for might be there at severly reduced price. Obviously, when shopping used you don't have as much choice as you would at retail. If you're looking for something even moderately specific, you need to be patient and just keep dropping by, and wait to see if something like what you want happens to be on hand. Then, you need to be very thorough in looking the item over, to make sure that it's not defective in some obvious way. The store staff is generally pretty careful about the merchandise they set out for sale, but things like minor rips or burns in clothing can slip through their inspection.

However, it was only recently that I noticed the store's book section. Not that I need any books. I've got a lifetime's library worth of literature, and should I ever have a job again, and should we come to have a decent home, I expect to have a proper library.

Eva's got a library of her own. It's not like mine, though. No Homer or Dante or Joyce or any history or math. No, Eva's library includes titles like "Baby Colors", "Mommy Hugs", "Snuggle Puppy" and "A Very Special Critter". Great books in their way, with illustrations Eva enjoys, and stories she likes to listen to. Since she's learning so many words so quickly now, her ability to listen is improving, and her taste in stories is expanding.

That's good, because I can't tell you how tiresome it gets reading the same three or four books to her every night for months. Even when her selection rotates slowly, it's like listening to the same twenty albums from your youth...until you're 45. After a while you know them too well to even pay attention any more. Maybe Eva's not there with her own books, but I sure am. Dad needs variety. Sometimes I don't care what the baby wants. I need me a little more variety in what I read to her. (I suspect Kate feels much the same, only not so stridently.)

So there's this book section at Savers. I quickly browsed it last week, and found two whole rows of shelves devoted to nothing but children's books. Eureka, I thought, This is how we replenish that library of hers!

Kate's workmates just threw her a baby shower for Fausto, and she was armed with gift cards to Target. I just got a delayed unemployment payment--we'd been surviving without it this past week--and we also got some straight cash for the shower. So I pushed for us to go shopping today, Kate at Target and me at Savers (about a half-mile apart on the commercial strip in Warwick). Since Kate was looking for sandals for Eva--something too specialized to find easily at Savers--she took the baby, and I dove into the books.

Winnie the Pooh, books by Sandra Boynton, Little Critter books (my favorites, aside from the classic Richard Scarry) by Mercer Mayer, and some really excellent Christmas books to stow away--I hit the motherlode today. Seventy cents a volume, so I got twenty books for Eva. Even picked up, since Kate was still busy at Target, a volume of Romantic writing to enjoy over an espresso at Starbucks afterward. As we'd say (and I did) in our Roses and Thorns, my trip to Savers and then Starbucks was unequivocally a rose.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Parental Incompetence, Parental Love

What about when you screw your baby up? Make her sick, make her sulk or cry by acting genuinely inconsiderate, accidentally hurt her (like, say, by washing her hands with water that's more suitable in hotness for adults). You take steps to make her or him better, that's what. And then you employ your common sense, or else hike your butt to the internet or a book or a doctor or a knowledgeable parent or a trusted friend or all of these and you figure out how not to screw your baby up again. And this process, in various guises, over various timescales, is part of the lifelong process of parenting.

Kate and I just got through with an adventure mostly concerning Eva, considering she was the one getting sick. She'd come down with a rash covering her arms and legs, reddish spots one-half to one inch in diameter, some with darkened red rings like the dreaded bullseye of Lyme disease. Rhode Island is pretty much ground zero for Lyme disease--we're less than sixty miles from Lyme, Connecticut, for which the disease is named--so it was a head-slappingly humilitating, not to mention slightly scary, moment yesterday morning when I first noticed the apparent bullseye patterns on Eva's right leg, one on her calf, one on her shin.

Kate and I share one car these days, and she'd driven it to work, so I couldn't bring Eva to the doctor's office. All I could do was e-mail Kate about it (thereby making her worry all day) and set up a doctor's appointment for today, which Kate would have off. Lyme disease incubates slowly enough, and the bullseyes typically appear quickly enough, that even if this was Lyme, I had small fear that Eva might suffer from it chonically. But I didn't want her to suffer at all.

It being a fine hot spell in early June, we walked down to the beach, about a quarter mile away, where Eva could run in the sand and wade in the ocean water of Narragansett Bay. She's always loved water and swimming, and even though she's still intimidated by the coldness and waves of the seashore, Eva's learning quickly that getting wet there is fun. For about three days straight we'd gone down and Eva had run on the sand and gotten wet. I was happy to watch her discovering a whole new part of the world, something she'll be able to enjoy for the rest of her life.

We'd spent the previous weekend in Maine, visiting Kate's parents, and Maine is still in the grip of blackflies. Blackfly season precedes mosquito season, is roughly as annoying, and lasts about a month. After tagging along after Mima through the yard, petting the bunnies, and sitting on the Ranger for a ride, Eva had a healthy number of bug bites. No big deal, we all did.

Flash forward to this week, when after a few days on the beach, the bites have become spreading red welts and the bullseyes had appeared. My level of concern rose steadily toward panic as the day went on, and by the time Kate came home in the late afternoon, Eva's legs were swollen and red, and more bullseyes had appeared on her arms. I was now alarmed.

But I didn't dare tell Kate, because I was about to head up to Boston as part of my process of preparing to enter the Naval Reserves--one part of my plan to make it through the doctorate program--and I didn't want to freak my poor wife out just before leaving for the evening. It seemed to me, worried as I was about those worsening welts, that to tell Kate I was scared, and then leave minutes later, would be like putting a grenade in her hands, pulling the pin, and walking away. A very unfriendly and very dangerous thing to do. Kate's good enough at working herself into a frenzy without my giving her a big push.

Besides, I counted on her sense. If I was scared, so was she, and if Eva seemed to require emergency room treatment immediately, Kate would go. And so she did. While I spent the evening in a Hilton hotel near Boston, studying calculus and the history of maps, Kate was sitting in the emergency room waiting area in South Kingstown. The doctor informed Kate that the rash was most likely an allergic reaction to sand flea bites.

"Has she been to the beach lately?" the doctor asked Kate.

"Um, yeah, for the past three days straight," she admitted, suddenly feeling a bit foolish. So we seemed to have our answer.

A few rubbings of antihistamine topical cream, and the rash seems to be going down, especially in Eva's arms. After three days if the rash persists then Lyme or something else might be involved. So we'll be looking sharply at Eva's skin for the next three days.

Of course I knew none of this while up in Boston. Since we're doing without cell phones for the time being, I had no idea, and I knew that if something like this happened, that I wouldn't. After leaving last night I thought it at least 50% likely that I'd come home to no Kate and Eva tonight, with Kate at the hospital having Eva tended to.

I arrived back home at 2 PM, driven by my recruiter, to no family car. I expected as much...but then remembered that I hadn't brought my own key. I doubted that Kate had left the door unlocked, and she hadn't.

Fortunately enough windows were open that I found one I could crawl through. Not the first time I'd had to break into my own place, but after a few phone calls I'd heard the basic story. Kate filled in the details when she arrived a bit later, having wrapped up this whole episode with a few hours' worth of therapeutic shopping for baby stuff.

So our task now is, how to limit these stupid flea bites without cutting the little girl off from the beach altogether? Homework, homework.

POSTSCRIPT--After sitting down tonight at dinner, as Kate and I were playing our normal Roses and Thorns game, Kate asked Eva if she had a rose. Let the record show that Eva answered "Dada!" for her first rose ever. And then said it again for her second.

Monday, June 6, 2011

New Numbers


Eva continues to grow quickly, both physically and behaviorally. Her personality is much more complex now than it was even four months ago, and she's picking up words and concepts now almost like they were toys. It's amusing and at times a bit amazing to see what she does, and how.

At times, however, it's just plain hilarious to watch her and listen to her. She's a largely unselfconscious bundle of inquisitiveness, playfulness and affection, balanced by a pronounced stubborn streak and a good old-fashioned temper. I like her.

Kate tends to be much more active in teaching Eva specifics like the alphabet, numbers and of course signs. I'll do such things in a more desultory, accidental way. I prefer to simply be around, provide her with a range of toys or an environment like going outside, and mostly let her discover her own amusements. Of course I play with her too, but Kate takes a serious initiative in things like this. She's a much better mother than I am.

Both with our explicit instruction, and through the Signing Time videos, and through just paying attention, Eva's loading up her vocabulary almost on a daily basis. A brief (not complete) lexicon of Eva-speak:

Kitty (formerly kit-tieh): cat
Doggy (formerly dog-gieh): dog
Tawaz: colors (i.e. crayons)
Bass: bath
Sawah: shower
Gapes: grapes
Nana: banana
Sasu: dinosaur (among her stuffed animals)
Side: Outside (i.e. I want to go outside!)
Out: Up (i.e. pick me up! We're working on this one)
Aa' done: All done (frequently screamed during a tantrum, or said when she's scared of something)
Sat: What's that?
Ta-ta: cracker
Waddah: water
AAHHH-gin: again (i.e. do that again!)
Sauce: Applesauce
Pizza: (she's gotten this one perfectly since she was 9 months old)
Wainjuh: Ranger (grandma Ande's--i.e. Mima's--Ranger 4-wheeler)
Dink: Drink
Seep: sleep

The list could go on and on, but that's a decent sampling of how her language approaches English pretty well, though she rarely puts several words together. She's still pretty much a one-word-at-a-time speaker.

What's more interesting is her personality, how she's learning coyness and even some skills at manipulation. But there's no mistaking when that temper shows up. Sometimes it's in deadly earnest, when she's howling with all her might for something different than what we're giving her, like some nights on going to bed, or frequently being strapped into her baby seat in the car. A recent development is brief flashes of the temper, when she logs a more or less perfunctory protest but seems to know she's going to lose.

She pulled one of these last night, after we'd lowered her into her crib for the night. Part of the new ritual in putting her to sleep is letting her finish her bottle of water before we take it away and turn out the light. So she stalls, sips the bottle slowly, rolls over on top of it and generally refuses to give it up. Some nights she's more charming than others, but still, by and large, when your baby wants to stretch the day out and make sure you keep her company, it's a wonderful thing. Still, bedtime is bedtime.

Eva had selected, among her many dozens of stuffed animals, a small gray koala to go into the crib with her (along with four other bears, a doll and a couple of blankies). I dropped the koala into the crib next to her as she clutched her bottle and resisted giving it to Kate.

Kate remained patient, counted to three, and then took the bottle from Eva's grasping hands. As soon as she'd lost the bottle Eva yelped sharply, grabbed the koala and threw it straight up into the air. It flew up, came back down and landed right in front of her. She ignored it and began a sullen pout, sucking on her red blankie while staring straight ahead.

That was a new kind of protest. It wasn't a genuine attempt to escape or sway us to her will. It was an expletive, a single burst of frustration followed by resigned acceptance of the truth. I was blown away. (I was also laughing to the point of coughing my lungs up.) Our 20-month-old baby had effectively just sworn at us.

Eva's also learning to count. Kate's taught her much of the alphabet (she tends to lose focus if I try to run through it backwards), so now she's turned her attention to numbers. Kate will make the ASL sign for each number in turn, and Eva will speak them. First up to ten, and now up to twenty. Based on tonight's effort, she has a little way to go. A recap of Eva's responses as Kate made the signs:

(1) One!
(2) Two!
(3) Fee!
(4) Fouah!
(5) Five!
(6) Six!
(7) Semmen!
(8) Eight!
(9) Nine!
(10) Ten!
(11) Leven!
(12) Twel!
(13) Benteen!
(14) Benteen!
(15) Benteen!
(16) Benteen!
(17) Benteen!
(18) Twunny!
(19) Twunny!
(20) Twunny!

So Eva's got a little ways to go with the numbers, but I think she's off to a fine start. She told her first story the other day, speaking a string of words which implied an actual sequence of events: "Mama. Dada. Kitty. Pizza. Sauce. Dink. Bass. Seep." Kate heard it and was pretty amazed.

So she's doing a fine job growing up, eating plenty of yogurt and getting her calcium, still in the 99th percentile for height and 75th for weight--tall and slim. Since I'm not so physically imposing myself, I'm hoping Eva winds up 6'6" and scares 98% of the boys away so they won't pester her in high school.

Sunday, June 5, 2011

The Wishing Tree

I love Irish music, and have for over a decade. I became aware of how much I loved it during the winter of 1997-98, when I was living in Philadelphia. I was attending U. Penn that year, studying Greek and Latin and making the decision whether to go into ancient literature as a teaching career (obviously no). I did spend lots of time in bars. I was emerging from an extended phase of drinking heavily, which had begun during my sophomore year in college, and continued on-and-off until just about then.

The death of my father in 1996 from brain cancer shook me into the awareness that my prolonged adolescence was over and it was time to start living a life I respected, and actually accomplishing a series of things I could call a career. In other words, it was time to grow up. I still drank quite a bit that year in Philadelphia, but I was putting an end to the problem. I realized that it's not enough to discover, as I did after sophomore year in college, that alcohol does damage to a person's life, brain and body. When the addiction has become physical, merely wanting to end the addiction is too weak a motive.

Alcohol damages and ends friendships, family relationships and careers. It precluded any scholarship I might have done in college. It deadens the conscious part of the personality, freeing the more primitive urges to express themselves.

This is why drunks tend to act crudely and boorishly, and be undesirable company in general. But if you cultivate the habit of not acting on those crude desires, but only let them loose in your mind, then being drunk can actually become a means to discover what is happening further down in your brain than the consciousness is willing to travel. That's important for thinkers and artists.

There's also the fact that drinking helps destroy relationships and career prospects. It engenders a general sense of shame in a person. And that shame itself can be useful--it is particularly strong acid on many of the assumptions in life, on social and religious conventions, and on identities based on race, nationality and class. In short, drinking heavily can train a person's mind to disregard as unimportant many of the things held sacred by reputable folks. Only your immediate emotional needs survive. If you're a writer or an artist, that is invaluable. It's a prerequisite for the vocation.

The society we've built up, including religion and government, certainly has its basis in our own psychology and in the world around us, but not all of it. Any system includes its own arbitrary limits, declarations peculiar to that system, and not necessarily to any other. Christians make Jesus Christ, only-begotten son of God, the focus of their religion. No other religious system does. Capitalism enshrines the idea that each person has the right to buy and own as much as he or she can afford. Not all economic systems are so. To step beyond those conventions takes hard work, both intellectually and emotionally.

So drinking has its benefits. But I decided against creative writing as a career, so I knew I had to sober up. It took a while, especially since I didn't want to go dry, and preclude the possibility of ever having a social drink again. I knew weaning myself of habitual drinking, without giving it up altogether, would be more difficult than going cold turkey.

But even so, it wasn't enough to simply want to give up drinking. I needed something else I could turn to, something I'd rather be doing instead of drinking. Otherwise, in my bored, solitary moments, I'd be too likely to find myself at a bar again, drunk or well on my way. I needed something similar to what Alcoholics Anonymous calls the "higher power". During that winter in Philadelphia, I found it: ballroom dancing. Ballroom dance was my avenue back toward being social again, making friends, meeting women, and doing something which was fun just by itself. A dance with a decent partner whom I might never see again after that dance is still a fine thing.

My six months of dancing in Philadelphia would be a long story in themselves, so I won't tell it here. But the lessons I took at that studio with my teacher Shana were, altogether, perhaps the biggest single step I took toward forgetting the drinking problem. Still, that didn't mean I wasn't drinking that year. I was, and I got to know plenty of bars around Philly. Philly is just Irish enough--not like Boston, but more than, say, Dallas--that many of the best bars have Irish themes. My favorite--and I have no idea if it's still there--was The Bards, in Central City. It was a modest pub, featuring its own in-house brew (Yard Ale--amber, as smooth as Guinness, but not as heavy), and no TVs. Conversation reigned at The Bards. A person might sit down at the bar, order a pint, pull out a book and start reading. It was a great place, an alcoholic coffee shop (and I was already in love with coffee shops). More than that, it featured musical Sundays.

A widespread custom in Irish bars all over the nation is that Sunday evenings feature a session of musicians who come in with their instruments and play. They tend to know each other, of course, but there's nothing formal about it. It's more of an open mic, though there's rarely any singing, and no mic. Traditional Irish music is something like jazz or blues, with some standard sets and chords and the potential for a band to simply improvise variations endlessly. I fell in love with pipes, fiddles, flutes, guitars, and Bodhran drums. I actually took some violin lessons that spring but decided I didn't have the time to invest.

Aside from becoming a Sunday evening chronic at the sessions, I snatched up a bunch of CDs of Irish music (ITunes didn't exist then, remember). I listened to those discs dozens and dozens of times. My Sunday morning breakfast-and-laundry ritual had an Irish soundtrack, to the point that I'd start making breakfast--either French toast or pancakes with coffee--and be sitting down to eat at pretty much the same point of the same song each week. It was almost choreographed.

Beyond the simple sound of the instruments and the varying rhythms, I loved the emotions the music was so full of. There is the endless, inconsolable lament, which I was sensitive to through the shipwreck of my late teens and 20's. There is also the inexpressible and orgasmic joy, a feeling of celebration which overwhelms everything else. Irish music by itself is nearly the perfect musical expression of the tao principle of yin and yang, two utter opposites forming one whole. I found in it my own psychology.

Two songs were my favorites, one joyful and the other melancholy. First, the happy one. It comes from one of the first discs I bought, actually a 2-disc set of various Irish artists playing tunes both traditional and original. It was composed by the piper Davy Spillane, and it's called "Sliverish". Because of that tune I feel that a banjo makes a fundamentally happy sound.

(And please forgive the crappy audio. It's the best I could do without a sound studio.)







My melancholy favorite is called "The Wishing Tree", composed by Seamus McGuire. It's not so much purely mournful--those tunes can be pretty horrid--but is more an even mixture of joy and sorrow, the combination of both which resounds through the ages of human existence. I think of a tree, somewhat like the tortoise of Asian and Indian mythology, which spans many human ages and comprehends all possibilities of existence, almost beyond life and death themselves.

The illustrations I've posted to this blog entry--one treelike, the other more of of a stylized celtic pattern--are actually concepts of the Norse mythical tree of creation, Yggdrasil. But Yggdrasil has much in common with my concept of the Wishing Tree. It participates in all things foul and fair, beautiful and ugly, good and evil, deadly and life-giving. Everything that can be wished for is already part of our concept of creation. And any wish soever must always have the contrary and unexpected consequences we fondly know as life.

The Wishing Tree implies to me a person's engagement in life, in setting hopes and aspirations, and whether attaining or not, engaging in the struggle which has defined our species throughout its existence. Victory is always attended with sorrow--whether through the austerity and discipline of the preparations, or through the consequences of winning, or by other means. Nothing in this life comes without cost. The stronger and deeper and more sincere a person's expression of life, the stronger the elements of triumph and tragedy exist within that person. Ultimately a person wishes for life or wishes for nothing. To the extent he or she wishes for life, that person learns the wisdom of the Wishing Tree. You cannot wish for part of it: you can only wish for all.

The piece itself is a melody which repeats three times, each time with additional instruments. The first run is a cello with very little accompaniment. A violin takes over the melody in the second repetition, with more strings in the background. The violin continues in the third, but with a swelling background which eventually takes over for the melody and then fades away.






In that tune I hear three generations: grandfather, father and son. By the time I first listened to the Wishing Tree, my father was dead and I had no immediate prospects for a family of my own. I thought of my grandfather, dad's father, and then my father, and me. Dad barely knew his own father, and I of course never met him. There was a mythical character to this distant man, seen in a few black-and-white photos and some fragments of handwriting, even taller apparently than my own father, a skilled musician who brought his accordion to his hospital ship during the war and played for the convalescent soldiers. He was also the man--a gynecologist who wooed and eventually married the younger sister of one of his patients--who wrote home that he was burying the boys he'd delivered earlier in his life. I'm told he returned from the war a broken, desolate man who committed suicide a few months later. I envisioned the deep-toned cello as his voice, sounding its wisdom alone through the echo chambers of time. He is followed by my own father, singing the same melody but higher, more plaintively, closer to the present. I saw myself as the third verse, surrounded by the cacaphony of life today, but producing a melody that hasn't changed.

It's easy to transfer this concept down one generation, with my father becoming the cello, me the second verse, and little Eliot due to become the third. He'll know my father as I knew my granddad, as a quasi-mythical presence who becomes larger due to his absence. When I hear the tune I start to think of this continuity, and then think metaphorically about the quality and the nature of my own wishes on the Wishing Tree. I'm at a crossroads of my career, and life, perhaps lacking the resources to continue on the professional path I've selected. Heroes choose their way, and I've frequently been overly meek and not had enough faith in my own ability. My failures at Dartmouth and later are painful enough evidence of this. I frequently return to the thought that my wishes on the tree have been too small, and that I've asked too little of myself. A crossroads like this in life is another chance for me to define who I am for the rest of my life. Which way will I go? I don't yet know.

* * *

To focus simply on the music for now. I'll list my favorite pieces of non-pop music, holding to my categories of those which have a mournful or somber character, and those which are ecstatic. In no particular order, because I couldn't rank these:

Sorrowful:
-Beethoven's 7th Symphony, 2nd movement (Allegretto);
-Mozart's Requiem, Lacrimosa;
-Samuel Barber, Adagio for Strings;
-Brahms' Requiem, Alles Fleisch ist Wie dem Grass;
-Seamus McGuire, The Wishing Tree;
-Dougie MacLean, These Broken Wings;
-Randall Thompson, Alleluia.

Happy:
-Leo Kottke, Stolen;
-Leo Kottke, Morning is the Longest Way Home;
-Altan, Dulaman;
-Hapa, Olinda Road;
-Davy Spillane, Sliverish.

(You might note more entries in the melancholy category. So be it. I'll add, however, that quite a few of the happy--or happy in their way, at least--songs which I love are of the pop/rock variety, like the Beatles' Savoy Truffle, Zep's That's the Way and Boogie with Stu, and Pearl Jam's Bugs. So there.)

A note also about the Beethoven Allegretto movement (and I think Brahms based his Alles Fleisch movement at least partly on it). Last night Kate and I watched The King's Speech, about how British King George VI overcame his stammering problem and was able to speak effectively to his empire during World War II via radio. King George and Winston Churchill combined through the radio to provide the leadership which British citizens needed during the Nazi siege on England, and during the worldwide onslaught of the Axis. The movie concludes with King George delivering his first major address of the war, as hostilities with Germany are about to begin. Churchill has just been elected, all attempts at peace have failed, and Germany has taken Poland by blitzkrieg in a matter of weeks. The Nazi military machine is faster and more fearsome than anything in history, and it is soon to turn toward England.

With this backdrop, the King--Berty as he is known in the film--steps into the broadcast room and prepares to speak. His speech therapist Lionel Logue is with him, and coaches him through the most strenuous effort of his adult life. The development of the film to this point has made it quite clear that the main role of the king is to communicate with his subjects via radio. Berty, with his stammering problem, has no greater weakness than speech. He knew as well as anybody the desperation of England's position in the coming war, and the importance of his own role. And he knew better than anybody that his weakest quality was at the same time his country's greatest need.

As the King prepared to speak, the first chord of Beethoven's 7th, 2nd movement, played. I thought, How strange--that sounds like Beethoven. The scene continued, and the movement carried on, and I felt that the choice of music was wrong, too heavy a setting for what should have been more combative or triumphal. But as the scene progressed--shots of Berty laboring to speak, hesitating and stopping, with Lionel standing in front of him desperately coaching him on in silence, alternating with shots of people around the country focused utterly on their radios--the import of his words became obvious. And I realized more and more that the choice of music came to fit the scene perfectly. The stark somberness matched the head-throbbing effort the King made to speak clearly. The darkness and urgency suited the eve of war.

It was a good film--not one of my favorites, but a good film--but that scene by itself is unforgettable, not least for the choice of music.